Tag Archive for: Civil Defense

☕ The Coffee Note That Shaped My Trial Philosophy

/by

Negotiation Lessons from Criminal Defense That Elevate Civil Practice

I couldn’t believe I’d made such a boneheaded move.

There I was—wedged into a slow-moving Starbucks line, about to be late for a meeting with a prosecutor. The mission? Negotiate a favorable outcome before my client’s case hit the grand jury.

So I improvised:
“Grabbing coffee. What’s your order?”

He responded. I showed up late—but with both drinks in hand.

While his contact was open on my phone, I typed his coffee preference into the notes. That tiny act became a bigger strategy: I started cataloging the details that make people feel seen—birthdays, kids’ names, anniversaries, favorite orders.

Turns out, the art of negotiation starts long before anyone mentions a statute.

1. Relationships Build Leverage—in Every Arena

In criminal defense, you quickly learn you’ll face the same adversaries repeatedly. That’s true in civil litigation too—especially in niche practices like land development.

Short-term victories lose value if they cost long-term trust. Whether you’re opposing counsel in a rezoning fight or working with local officials on a contested variance, relationships are your leverage.

I strive to be the kind of lawyer people respect and enjoy working with. Empathy isn’t fluff—it’s strategy.

2. Cases Are Made of People, Not Just Paper

Criminal work taught me to showcase the whole human behind the charges. Those life portfolios I compiled—white binders full of personal context—weren’t just courtroom props; they were bridges to understanding.

And I use the same storytelling in civil trial work.

In land use disputes, for instance, the story isn’t just zoning codes—it’s the livelihood of families, the impact on communities, the evolution of neighborhoods. Humanizing your client builds credibility—and influence.

3. Timing Is Tactic

The earlier you engage, the more control you have. Criminal cases taught me the importance of pre-indictment leverage—and that concept absolutely translates to civil litigation.

Before discovery kicks in, before tempers flare—early clarity can drive resolution. Whether I’m asserting qualified immunity under 42 USC § 1983 or drafting a Rule 37 letter, I aim to be the calm voice in the room… early and often.

4. Ego Is Expensive

In my early years, I fell into unnecessary rivalries with other young attorneys. And while some of those courtroom battles ended in my favor, I realized something better: a quiet dismissal beats a loud acquittal.

In civil practice, that lesson translates perfectly.

Firing off aggressive letters may impress the client copy list—but it rarely moves the needle in negotiations. Ego-driven posturing wastes time. I prefer clarity, courtesy, and precision. A smart lawyer knows when to speak softly and carry airtight documentation.

5. Negotiation Is a Long Game—So Play It Well

Sometimes you can settle. Sometimes you can’t. But civil or criminal, process matters.

You want opposing counsel to know you’re methodical, fair, and prepared to fight when needed. That kind of reputation isn’t built overnight—it’s earned through consistency, transparency, and respect.

And yes, sometimes, through a well-timed espresso.

📚 Sidebar: Resources to Deepen Your Trial Strategy

Curated tools for building relationships, refining negotiation, and winning cases with integrity

Final Thought: Civility Wins Cases

Law isn’t just argument—it’s relationship management. I’ve found more success through kindness and quiet force than through theatrics.

As Twain put it:
“Never wrestle with a pig. You both get dirty, and the pig enjoys it.”

And as Proverbs says:
“A gentle answer turns away wrath.”

Whether defending a criminal case or challenging a land development petition, my aim is the same: prepare deeply, communicate respectfully, and negotiate like the long game matters—because it always does.

Discovery: From Manila Envelopes to Motion Practice

/by

In my years as a criminal defense trial lawyer, “discovery” wasn’t a process—it was an event.

It usually arrived inside a creased manila envelope, thick with paper and stapled together like a grade school art project. Surveillance footage came in strange formats. Witnesses didn’t always give statements. If something crucial was missing, I had to hike over to the DA’s office or hunt down that one dusty machine that could read the footage or play the video.

So criminal discovery became a series of fleeting, high-stakes moments. Preliminary hearings, collateral proceedings like forfeiture actions or license suspension hearings, even open records requests—I treated them all like mining expeditions. Interviews were vital. Strategy was survival. I tried multi-week felony cases with nothing but a basic police report and carefully banked inconsistencies. And I learned to do much with little.

If you’re unfamiliar with exactly what I’m talking about, this article from FindLaw gives a brief and helpful explanation of the difference between discovery in criminal and civil proceedings. It lays out how criminal discovery is narrower, often asymmetric, and tightly constrained by constitutional protections—especially compared to its civil counterpart.

Fast forward to today, and the shift into civil litigation feels like stepping onto a different battlefield. The procedural landscape is expansive. Depositions, interrogatories, requests for admission, Rule 26 conferences. The toolbox is real, and it’s stocked. And yet all those days spent being scrappy serve me well here!

But coming from a background where discovery was improvisational, I now approach civil discovery like a surgeon, not a tourist.

I walk into depositions knowing exactly what I want to lock down. Written discovery isn’t a fishing expedition—it’s a scalpel. And without a magistrate judge glancing over their glasses to try to limit my scope (they knew what I was up to), I rely on discipline rather than mere deadlines to get it done.

And let’s talk about summary judgment. The idea that I can strike a case before trial using Rule 56 still thrills me. I said just yesterday, as I was prepping my summary judgment packet, “I think it’s the coolest thing that summary judgment even exists.” In the criminal world, your closest equivalent might’ve been a demurrer or a motion for a bill of particulars—procedural nibbles that rarely carried any real bite.

So yes, civil litigation offers luxury. But it demands maturity. Coming up the hard way made me strategic. It taught me thrift. It trained me to see clarity amid chaos, and that instinct transfers beautifully into this new terrain.

Looking back, criminal defense was like the proverbial walking uphill in the snow both ways. But the cold made me tough. And now, with tools I used to dream of, I don’t take a single one for granted.

⚖️ Key Lessons from the Transition

  • Criminal discovery taught me discipline
    When every minute mattered, clarity wasn’t optional—it was essential.
  • Civil discovery rewards focus over volume
    With so many tools available, knowing which tool to use is more powerful than having them all.
  • Strategic instincts transfer across domains
    Tight timelines, limited access, and trial-first thinking in criminal law sharpened my edge for civil practice.
  • The luxury of summary judgment is real—but so is the responsibility
    Knowing its value makes me fight smarter, not longer.

📚 This post is part of my ongoing series: What Being a Criminal Defense Attorney Taught Me About Being a Civil Defense Attorney.
Stay tuned for the next installment, where I’ll dive into how cross-examination principles from criminal trials elevate witness prep in civil litigation.

From Horns of a Dilemma to Running the Table: Lessons from the Trial Trenches

/by

This story begins with me squarely on the horns of a dilemma.

My then-boss and mentor taught me a great deal—but also carried a drinking problem that manifested in his reluctance to work afternoons. As a result, I was frequently placed in an awkward and precarious position.

The routine would unfold like this: the partner’s paralegal would tell me I was covering court that afternoon. What that actually meant was showing up, opening a file whose discovery packet was still bound by the original staple it arrived in—and picking a jury for a criminal trial.

Suddenly, I’d be standing in front of a judge, expected to select jurors and begin trial. The dilemma was clear: I couldn’t possibly deliver constitutionally effective representation under those circumstances. But telling my boss and mentor “I refuse to go forward” was far easier said than done.

Most days, either a settlement was reached or the judge would understand how untenable the situation was. But I knew I was on borrowed time. Sooner or later, I’d be ordered to proceed—unprepared—or risk losing the job I mostly liked.

So I took a systematic approach.

I approached the prosecutors and judges in the court where this was happening the most and proposed a deal: identify five aging cases they truly wanted resolved. They gave me five for the next month’s calendar, and I spent that month preparing thoroughly using everything I knew—and quite a bit I learned on the fly. This step-by-step guide to criminal defense preparation covers much of the practical process I had to internalize quickly.

Then trial week arrived.

  • Monday: Picked a jury in a DUI case—won an acquittal.
  • Tuesday: Picked another DUI jury—by Thursday morning, scored a second acquittal.
  • Later Thursday: Picked a jury for a family violence battery case. A witness was unavailable, and the case was dismissed.
  • Friday: The final two cases were disposed of—one dismissed, the other resolved with an exceptional plea offer.

In about four days, I’d run the table.

That week taught me a masterclass in big-picture thinking, creative problem-solving, rapid trial preparation, and the art of thinking on your feet. (For a broader view of the full arc of trial readiness—from evidence review to courtroom strategy—this complete guide to trial prep mirrors much of what I had to master under pressure.)

My boss, never short on hubris, was quietly pleased. Judges were thrilled at the cleared docket. Prosecutors were…less thrilled. Let’s just say they weren’t expecting to get steamrolled.

After that, I was thrown into chaotic trial situations far less frequently. Instead, I began to be tapped as second chair in higher-stakes cases. And despite the dysfunction that led me there, I’ll never discount my boss’s raw trial talent.

Fast forward to the present: I’m transitioning into civil trial defense, where trials are far rarer. But my love of the courtroom endures. After decades of litigation—countless trials, motions, and hearings—I still find the lectern of a courtroom to be one of the most peaceful places on earth.

This post marks the beginning of a blog series: What Criminal Defense Taught Me About Being an Effective Civil Litigator. For those curious about how strategic thinking translates into civil litigation, this overview of civil trial strategies serves as a solid starting point.

🧠 Lessons Learned

  • Systematic preparation can rescue you from chaos.
    Turning disarray into a defined trial calendar transformed my circumstances.
  • Relationships with judges and prosecutors matter.
    Building goodwill gave me the space to propose and execute my plan.
  • Trial practice teaches strategy under pressure.
    Thinking fast and adapting on the fly are skills you only sharpen in the trenches.
  • Even dysfunction can offer growth.
    The flawed situation catalyzed significant development in my courtroom skills.
  • Winning cases builds momentum—and credibility.
    That week shifted perceptions and elevated my role within the firm.
  • Peace lives in mastery.
    Amid personal and professional chaos, the courtroom lectern remains my place of focus and calm.

ADDRESS

199 W Jefferson St.
Madison, GA 30650

PHONE

678-610-6624

EMAIL

tori@scottkeylaw.com