Scott Key & Associates
  • Home
  • Practice Areas
    • Embedded Counsel
    • Appeals
    • Trial Litigation
  • Meet The Team
    • Scott Key
    • Kayci Timmons
    • Tori Bradley
    • Sam Kuperberg
  • Resources
    • Blogs
    • Podcasts
    • Upload Consultation Documents
    • FAQs
  • Contact
  • Call 678-610-6624
  • Menu Menu

Should You Post Bond? Not Always

June 4, 2012/by J. Scott Key

Last week, I closed out an armed robbery case quite successfully. The case was reduced down to robbery, the client was sentenced under Georgia’s First Offender Act (meaning that he has the opportunity to come out of this with no conviction on his record), and after completing a one-year residential program, he is on probation. There were a number of things that made this outcome possible, but one factor stands out. The client never bonded out. He was arrested ten months ago, and we never even sought a bond.

Things got tough along the way. The client implored his family to seek a bond for him, and the pressure on them was difficult. Things got particularly difficult during the holiday season. But we never petitioned the court for a bond. And, by the time 10 months passed and this case was at its “resolution point” in court, we had 10 months served under our belt. The client, a very young man, had suffered some consequences, and he had seen some things. He had seen folks get released only to return back to jail. He saw enough of the inside to wake him up but not enough to embitter him. He and his family would likely tell you that he did more than 10 months of growing up in the last 10 months.

Our plea was non-negotiated, and when the judge pronounced sentence, he told my client that he likely would never have agreed to my recommendation had he not served a great deal of time already. The family’s decision regarding bond reflected well on them. Judges are often more willing to take a chance on a person when they know that the family can provide structure upon release. And their decision to leave the client in jail during the pretrial months reflected well on their ability to provide structure once this young man was out on probation.

When I became the lawyer 10 months ago, I advised my client not to seek a bond, and I told the family to try their best to resist when the asking got tough. And I had to remind them of these things a few times throughout the year. But when I made the strategic decision not to seek a bond a year ago, I imagined that things might come together like this by the time we resolved the case. The decision paid out.

Please don’t hear me to say that it is usually a good idea to leave a loved one in jail. Rather, I share this story with you to let you know that there may arise a case, from time to time, where bonding a person out is not the best thing for the client. All cases are, of course, different, and whether to make bond is one of those decisions best thought through with your lawyer. But here are some things to think about when it comes to deciding whether to post a loved one’s bond.

Are people counting on the loved one for support?

Obviously, if a client is the provider for a family, it is likely better for the client to fulfill his duties to those she loves. If a prolonged pre-trial incarceration will make others suffer or result in lost employment, then by all means incarceration for any length of time is not the best idea. But for a youthful defendant without such responsibilities, particularly if the defendant is on a road to increasing criminality, some extra days of pre-trial incarceration can help the client “get it” and may take him away from friends, from drugs and alcohol, and other opportunities to get in worse trouble.

Is the case beatable, or will a conviction inevitably mean probation?

If the case is defensible, is likely to be reduced, or will likely result in probation, then it makes little sense to prolong pre-trial incarceration. However, if the case is one of those that will be plead one day, if there is minimum incarceration involved, and if a judge will likely believe that the client should do some time eventually, it can make sense to remain in jail and not make a bond. There are a couple of harsh things about incarceration and how it works on the human psyche.

  • We can get accustomed to just about anything in short order. But it can be torture to dread something. Everytime I go to a swimming pool, I look like a big wuss. I hate jumping into water that feels the least bit cold. But once I’m in, I’m fine. The dread of the cold is much worse than the cold itself. Once a person is in jail, it sucks, but it’s a level of suckiness that can be tolerated for a few days. And as bad as it is to spend another day there, there is one thing worse — to leave there and think about coming back. That dread can lead to irrational decisions and disastrous no-win trials.
  • The devil you know. People generally prefer to do time in their home town over going through diagnostics and doing time in the prison system. So, doing time on the front end can be preferable. Of course, this advice is not intended as one size fits all. If you live in Mayberry where Aunt Bee is preparing biscuits for the inmates, you’d probably prefer to do your time there. If you just got arrested in Fulton County, then you may prefer to do your time on the back end of the sentence or in one of those places you see featured in the show Locked Up, Abroad.

Think about what your bargaining chips are

Defense counsel gets to bargain with two kinds of chips. First, you can bargain over likely outcomes of a hypothetical trial. Part of your job as defense counsel in a negotiation is to portray trial as a losing proposition for your opponents. Obviously, you do that through your giftedness with the English language, your ability to perceive weaknesses in your opponent’s case, and your ability to strengthen your own. The risker the bet trial becomes for you opponent, the more likely you are to work this all out with minimal damage.

The other bargaining chips consist in debating the seriousness of the conduct, the relative goodness of your client, and the number of people who can say that he will never do this sort of things again. When you are talking about things like this, you are really bargaining about what the case is worth. In a civil case, “worth” is measured in terms of dollars. In the criminal context, “worth” is measured in terms of punishment. And, it can be very powerful to tell a prosecutor or a judge that he’s been punished already. So, being able to take on a sentence pre-trial, may give you greater bargaining power when others try to demand that your client go to jail. There’s no better argument than “he’s already been there, and he never asked to come out until now.” In money parlance, a few months in a county jail can be a very good “investment” that minimizes your client’s net sentence.

Again, I am not claiming that most people should remain incarcerated pretrial. Rather, I want to suggest that the question of whether to make bond can sometimes be more nuanced than it might appear.

Tags: bond, Sentencing, tough love, trial strategy
Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on X
  • Share on X
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
0 0 J. Scott Key /wp-content/uploads/SK-Logo-Black-White.png J. Scott Key2012-06-04 16:20:452012-06-04 16:20:45Should You Post Bond? Not Always
You might also like
More Appellate Lessons Learned from a Georgia Trial
Study Shows that Few Have Counsel for Bond Hearings
Supreme Court of Georgia Changes Approach to Sentencing After Appeal
0 replies

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Related Resources

  • Living a Fulfilling Life (as a Lawyer)
  • Originalist Textualism 101 for Practitioners with Keith Blackwell
  • What I’ve Read, Heard, And Am Pondering This Week: June 1
  • Textualism As An Advocacy Tool
  • What I’ve Read, Heard, And Am Pondering This Week: March 7
  • Embracing the Legal Fundamentals with William Maselli

Archives

  • October 2024
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • October 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • July 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • July 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • August 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • September 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010

ADDRESS

199 W Jefferson St.
Madison, GA 30650

PHONE

678-610-6624

EMAIL

tori@scottkeylaw.com
© Scott Key & Associates, all rights reserved. | Website by Madison Studios  
  • LinkedIn
  • Youtube
An Update to the Typography PostIn Memoriam: Strickland v. Washington
Scroll to top