Scott Key & Associates
  • Home
  • Practice Areas
    • Embedded Counsel
    • Appeals
    • Trial Litigation
  • Meet The Team
    • Scott Key
    • Kayci Timmons
    • Tori Bradley
    • Sam Kuperberg
  • Resources
    • Blogs
    • Podcasts
    • Upload Consultation Documents
    • FAQs
  • Contact
  • Call 678-610-6624
  • Menu Menu

Managing Motions for Mistrial in Georgia to Preserve Them for Appeal

August 18, 2010/by J. Scott Key

So, I just got finished reading a transcript on a case I am appealing. Halfway through the trial, a witness for the State said something highly improper. Counsel moved for a mistrial. These moments in the reading of a transcript are a little like watching a really close college football game, because I am pulling for some magic words that preserved the record for appeal. So, I flip the page, and the lawyer explains why the testimony was improper and why a mistrial is necessary. Good stuff.

Cue the drama and suspense music. The judge dismisses the jury. As soon as the jury is out of the room, there’s a little more argument. The Court tells the State and the witness not to say it anymore. The Court makes the prosecutor warn all the other witnesses not to say it. The objection is sustained.

Then, the jury is asked back in, and the trial continues. No ruling on the motion. No renewal after corrective action. Nothing but a good appeal down the tubes. Mistrial issuesin a transcript are often the litigation equivalent of a Gilligan’s Island rescue. They almost preserve the issue for appeal, but they don’t quite make it.

So, since my theme this week is preserving the record for appeal, let me say a few things about managing mistrial motions in Georgia.

Here are three things to remember, and they are really easy. Again, as I mentioned before, you don’t need to be mean to do this. You can be very nice in fact:

  1. Move for a mistrial and state exactly why the testimony is objectionable and why no lesser remedy that stopping the trial will work. Moving for a mistrial is like asking the judge to detonate a nuclear bomb on the trial. The trial ends. The State is out the money it spent trying the case to this point. Usually, you will be arguing something along the lines that the testimony or comment was so prejudicial that there is no way that the jury can make a fair decision from this point forward.
  2. Hold your ground and seek a ruling. You might think that a ruling is implied if the Court starts doing something else. But take a second and get her to state the obvious. Just ask, “your honor, did you deny my mistrial motion. Just for the record.” Get a ruling.
  3. Renew, renew, renew. If the Court scolds the prosecutor or the witness and says “don’t ever do this again.” If the Court gives a limtiting instruction, or even worse asks you to draft the limiting instruction, then say “judge, I’ll help you draft it, but I don’t think anything will work at this point.” After the corrective action is taken, renew your motion for mistrial. Check out Matiatos v. State or Northern v. State for some guidelines.

But what if you are the appellate attorney, and it wasn’t preserved?

You could argue that it was plain error. But that’s a tough hill to climb. Check out State v. Gordon for what plain error is. You are then left with ineffective assistance of counsel, which has worked for me in at least one other case.

But life will really be easier if it doesn’t come to that. Just state your motion and renew, renew, renew to give me some stuff to work with later.

Tags: Corrective Action, Curative Instruction, Mistrial
Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on X
  • Share on X
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
0 0 J. Scott Key /wp-content/uploads/SK-Logo-Black-White.png J. Scott Key2010-08-18 17:22:502010-08-18 17:22:50Managing Motions for Mistrial in Georgia to Preserve Them for Appeal
You might also like
More Appellate Lessons Learned from a Georgia Trial
0 replies
  1. www.binance.com sign up
    www.binance.com sign up says:
    September 12, 2024 at 4:04 am

    Your point of view caught my eye and was very interesting. Thanks. I have a question for you.

  2. binance
    binance says:
    September 25, 2024 at 1:58 am

    Can you be more specific about the content of your article? After reading it, I still have some doubts. Hope you can help me.

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Related Resources

  • Living a Fulfilling Life (as a Lawyer)
  • Originalist Textualism 101 for Practitioners with Keith Blackwell
  • What I’ve Read, Heard, And Am Pondering This Week: June 1
  • Textualism As An Advocacy Tool
  • What I’ve Read, Heard, And Am Pondering This Week: March 7
  • Embracing the Legal Fundamentals with William Maselli

Archives

  • October 2024
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • October 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • July 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • July 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • August 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • September 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010

ADDRESS

199 W Jefferson St.
Madison, GA 30650

PHONE

678-610-6624

EMAIL

tori@scottkeylaw.com
© Scott Key & Associates, all rights reserved. | Website by Madison Studios  
  • LinkedIn
  • Youtube
Kemp Investigating Qualifications of Georgia Court of Appeals CandidateCLE Opportunities for Criminal Appeals and Habeas Lawyers in Georgia
Scroll to top