Scott Key & Associates
  • Home
  • Practice Areas
    • Embedded Counsel
    • Appeals
    • Trial Litigation
  • Meet The Team
    • Scott Key
    • Kayci Timmons
    • Tori Bradley
    • Sam Kuperberg
  • Resources
    • Blogs
    • Podcasts
    • Upload Consultation Documents
    • FAQs
  • Contact
  • Call 678-610-6624
  • Menu Menu

Three Things You Should Know About Parole in Georgia

April 20, 2011/by admin

A few days ago, I met with two perspective families of potential parole clients. They had different kinds of problems. I had seen both problems before. The first had a loved one who was ten years into a twenty-year sentence for armed robbery. The second had a loved one who was puzzled that he had been in prison for more than four years already for a ten-year prison sentence for possession with intent. In the first case, a competing attorney I had never heard of had offered an outstanding deal to represent them for parole on the armed robbery conviction. In the second instance, the legal advice came pre-plea. The law had negotiated a trafficking charge into a lesser offense for possession with intent to distribute. The lawyer advised the client to take it because he would be out after serving a third of his prison time. The family wanted a lawyer to work on parole but also to figure out what the hold-up was. In these two clients, I encountered the three things people don’t know about parole in Georgia.

You Can Never Be Paroled for Some Offenses.

The first was an easy case – in the sense that neither I nor anyone else could be of assistance. You can never be paroled for armed robbery in Georgia. The competing lawyer could never deliver on what he was offering the family. There are two equally-disturbing possibilities behind the lawyer’s advice. Either the lawyer doesn’t know the law (in which case, he should refrain from parole work until he knows a little more) or he is trying to get some money knowing that he can never deliver.

Before employing an attorney for parole, it is good for prospective clients to know whether parole is even a possibility for the conviction offense. A recent murder conviction carries no possibility of parole for thirty years. Some offenses require an inmate to serve 65% of the sentence. It is best to know the answer to the eligibility question before going any further. But assuming that the prospective parole client is eligible, it is important to know that the parole grid is not carved in stone.

The Grid is Not an Absolute

My advice to persons contemplating a plea agreement: never agree to serve a sentence or risk receiving a sentence unless you know that you could do every single day of it. Becaue you just might serve that long even if you are parole eligible on day one. The State Board of Pardons and Paroles follows a grid. But that grid is advisory. The Board can, in many cases, parole as soon as a day into a sentence or as late as the last day of a sentence. The Board can deny parole altogether. The grid, in the hands of trial counsel, can be in a dangerous thing, particularly if the client banks on it in making plea decisions.

If trial counsel brings the grid into plea discussions, it is important to explain that the Board is free to ignore their grid and grant parole sooner or later than the time the grid recommends. So a high grid is not necessarily the end of the world. And a low grid is not necessarily an indicator that you’ll be out soon, or ever.

The Board Doesn’t Have to Tell You Anything

The Board can do what it wants to do in cases where it has discretion. And the Board doesn’t have to tell you or anyone else what is in an inmate’s parole file or why it has made a particular decision. There could be a really bad item in your file that may make parole difficult. And there may be a great piece of information that could help you get parole. And you will never know about either.

All that stuff you see in the movies (i.e. Shawshank Redemption, Raising Arizona) where an inmate meets with the entire parole board to make a pitch isn’t the way parole is generally done in Georgia. In reality, a hearing officer works up the file and makes a particular report an written recommendation. That report is circulated among the Board for a vote. A good bit of the work is done on the front end. Members of the Board will generally not have the time to devote to the file that the hearing officer has. And you’ll never get to see that report or anything else in the file. However, the Board is often open to hear other information. The trick is getting the attention of an overworked Parole Board and particularly in competing with the kind of attention the hearing officer’s report will get. Even if the parole board is not going to grant parole the first time around, the first few months of a sentence are critical for the duration of the inmate’s time in prison. Because the initial parole decision will carry weight upon future considerations.

So, here’s how the appointments ended. I advised the first client that parole was not a possibility and declined representation. With the second, I advised that we could do two things. We could prepare a parole packet for presentation to the Board. We could also consider a habeas attack on the guilty plea since it was entered upon faulty advice about parole eligibility. We’ll see what happens.

Tags: Armed Robbery, Parole Misconceptions, Parole Packet
Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on X
  • Share on X
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
0 0 admin /wp-content/uploads/SK-Logo-Black-White.png admin2011-04-20 08:32:202011-04-20 08:32:20Three Things You Should Know About Parole in Georgia
0 replies

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Related Resources

  • ☕ The Coffee Note That Shaped My Trial Philosophy
  • Living a Fulfilling Life (as a Lawyer)
  • Originalist Textualism 101 for Practitioners with Keith Blackwell
  • What I’ve Read, Heard, And Am Pondering This Week: June 1
  • Textualism As An Advocacy Tool
  • What I’ve Read, Heard, And Am Pondering This Week: March 7

Archives

  • July 2025
  • October 2024
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • October 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • July 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • July 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • August 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • September 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010

ADDRESS

199 W Jefferson St.
Madison, GA 30650

PHONE

678-610-6624

EMAIL

tori@scottkeylaw.com
© Scott Key & Associates, all rights reserved. | Website by Madison Studios  
  • LinkedIn
  • Youtube
How Much Longer Before The Georgia Appellate Court Rules?Choosing Fonts for E-filing to Cater to Screen or Page
Scroll to top